Roberto Núñez to José Y. Limantour, Mexico, 26 August 1899

TASK: take a partial decipherment further: Roberto Núñez to José Y. Limantour, Mexico, 26 August 1899
This page: https://dbourdeau.github.io/cyphersolver/further/nunez1899.html

You are helping a public research project finish reading historical cipher letters. This one is read in part:
the key works, but some pieces are still open. Your job is to close one or more of the open gaps below.

THE READING
  Write-up:   https://dbourdeau.github.io/cyphersolver/nunez1899.html (read it first: how the text was read, the key, the reading)
  Date:       1899
  Outcome:    existing decipherment · partial
  Read now:   93.3% of the deciphered cipher tokens give sense (pieces below may be untouched)
  Files:      https://github.com/dbourdeau/cyphersolver/tree/main/targets/nunez1899 (NOTES.md, key, transcription, reading, scripts)

OPEN GAPS (from NOTES.md, "## Remaining gaps")
  1. [no-key-material: needs a new source] ampida (L06) - blocker: no-key-material; the contemporary translator left it blank; context and Limantour's answer ("asunto Depósito Banco Inglaterra") suggest "depositen" or "inviertan", marked as a guess.
  2. [too-short: needs a new source] te se (L16) - blocker: too-short; two telegraphed words with no counterpart in the translation, possibly a transmission error; one occurrence, nothing to test them against.
  3. [illegible: needs a new source] curadela, pareciendo.., torrejones - blocker: illegible; last letters hidden under the pencil docket (L04), the watermark (L20) or at the edge (L05); their values are still those of 9928.
  4. [illegible: needs a new source] serian (L17), rolliza (L19) - blocker: illegible; the blind review (12 Nov 2026) saw serian possibly beginning with v and rolliza possibly ending in o; left as transcribed, neither changes the reading.
  5. [too-short: needs a new source] pasado año (L02) rendered literally, "after a year"; "next year" is also possible - blocker: too-short; two words with no other occurrence.
  6. [no-key-material: needs a new source] 36 code values rest on the one contemporary translation, with no second source - blocker: no-key-material; no codebook of this clave was found in the file.

ALREADY TRIED (from NOTES.md, "## Escalation")
  [x] siblings: the other telegrams of the code opened: 9922, 9929 and 9930 (the frozen key), and the translation 9927/9928; 9906-9908 fetched and not used, 9923 not opened.
  [x] clear-pages: the translation filed as 9927 (pencil draft) and 9928 (fair copy) is the decipherment; it was found here although the record says "sin traducción".
  [x] known-keys: the code of this series, frozen from 9922, 9929 and 9930, tested on 9926 (28 of 28); the Speyer code of 1905 is a different one (not this key).
  [x] print: one web search (12 Nov 2026) found work on the 1899 conversion loan (Weller, EHS working paper 13023; a UNAM thesis on Limantour's Hacienda) and no edition of this telegram or its translation.
  [x] retry: every code word decrypted again with key.tsv; check_marks.py passes (22 lines, 0 mismatches).

STEPS
0. Set up. If you can run a shell, fork and clone the repository and work inside it:
     git clone https://github.com/dbourdeau/cyphersolver.git
   Then read, in this order: CONTRIBUTING.md (how a contribution is sent and credited); README.md, sections
   "Repository layout" and "Conventions" (how readings are measured and named); targets/nunez1899/NOTES.md in full, and the
   key, transcription and reading files it names; lang/README.md (shared language models).
   Work in targets/nunez1899/. Add your findings to NOTES.md under a dated heading without rewriting what is there, and
   update the "## Remaining gaps" line of every gap you close. Keep WORKLOG.md there: one dated line per step
   (hypothesis, value tried, solver run, crib, control), failures included. Do not edit docs/ (the site is generated).
   If you cannot run a shell, fetch the files from the links above and keep your work in files you send with the issue.
1. Pick a gap. Start with the ones marked "doable now" (open-codes, not-attempted, left-open): the images and the key
   are online, so they need only work. A gap marked "needs a new source" (no-key-material, too-short, illegible,
   needs-physical-access) can be closed only by something new: a key
   or a deciphered sibling found elsewhere, a better image, a printed edition or calendar, a photograph from the archive.
   For those, search for that material first, and say where you looked even when you find nothing.
2. Start from the existing key and transcription in the folder. Do not rebuild the key from scratch, and do not
   re-read parts that are already read unless you find an error in them.
3. For a code group or sign value: list every place the group occurs, show how each reads with the value you propose,
   and say what still does not fit. For a passage: re-read it at the image and give the folio and line. For a missing
   letter or leaf: say where it is held and how it can be reached.
4. Measure again. Apply the key to the whole text, write the reading file, and count the share of cipher tokens that
   give sense (not an estimate). The reading is "complete" only when (1) at least 95% of its cipher tokens give sense;
   (2) no gap is left untried; (3) every letter in it is covered; (4) what stays open is scattered code groups or names,
   or pieces blocked from outside. Otherwise it stays "partial": say which gaps are still open and why.
5. Be honest. Mark every uncertain word with [?], leave unread groups as their numbers or signs, and never fill a gap
   with a plausible guess. A gap retried and still open, with what was ruled out, is worth reporting.

REPORT BACK
With a clone: open a pull request with your changes to targets/nunez1899/. Say in the description which gaps you worked on,
  the share read before and after, and how you want to be credited (name, initials or handle, and a link).
Without one: open an issue: https://github.com/dbourdeau/cyphersolver/issues/new?template=further-reading.yml&title=Further+reading%3A+nunez1899&page=nunez1899.html
  Give the write-up, the gap you worked on (its line in Remaining gaps, or the code group, folio and line), what you
  propose, the evidence (every occurrence, the images or sources), the share read before and after, your step log,
  and the tools and AI model you used.
If you cannot open issues or pull requests, write this report for your human to send. Credit goes to the person who sends it.