47 54 85 n1 79 38 47 55 n1 8 45 27 29 44 56 84 · KNOW TO THOW TO FOLLOW · n1=to n3=the c5=for h1=no 95=my 98=artillery

Oxford → Prince Rupert · homophonic cipher with nomenclator · 29 April 1645

Charles I to Prince Rupert, Oxford, 29 April 1645

Charles I
fromCharles I
Prince Rupert
toPrince Rupert

British Library, Add MS 18983 f. 14 (DECODE R4921): one holograph page marked “Duplicate”, with a clear opening and close and about 300 cipher groups between them. DECODE lists it with no decryption, and no earlier decipherment was found in print.

George Lasry’s 2020 reconstruction of the King’s cipher with the Queen (TNA SP106-5, on DECODE R929) was made for other letters. It was found to fit this one and was applied unchanged. The sense is complete; about twenty code groups are open or supplied from context.

Daniel Bourdeau · posted · updated

Method: read after matching with key from external sources · Extent: complete

Credits · George Lasry (key or decipherment used)

At a glanceExternal key matched · complete

The letter
Charles I to his nephew Prince Rupert, Oxford, 29 April 1645; a one-page duplicate, clear at the opening and cipher almost to the foot.
Where
British Library, Add MS 18983 f. 14; DECODE R4921, listed with no decryption.
The cipher
A homophonic alphabet on the numbers 1–80 plus a nomenclator of letter+digit groups (n1, n3, c5, h1…).
How it was read
The group shapes match a period tally of the King’s cipher with the Queen (R9116), which pointed to Lasry’s “TNA SP106-5” key; it deciphered the letter without change.
What it says
Hemmed in at Oxford, the King cannot convoy his artillery to Rupert without horses; he has sent for Goring and asks Rupert to march speedily and fetch it.
Credit
The key is George Lasry’s, reconstructed in 2020 from the Queen’s letters of January 1646.
Still open
About twenty code groups are open or supplied only from context (61, 211, 186, 214, 376, 148, 327, c1, d4, e4, o1, 03, 05); they do not change the sense.

01 The document

One page in the King’s hand, dated “Oxford 29 April 1645” and marked “Duplicate”, the second copy sent by another route. It opens in clear: “Nepueu, if you have receaved my two which were upon friday & sonday last this will be the lesse necessarye, howsoeuer it is fit to tell you that I very much like your opinion”. The cipher then runs almost to the foot, with a few clear words kept inside it (“I have”, “yett will”, “but what”, “order”, an “&”, “assuringe you that”). It closes “upon the word of your loving Oncle & most faithfull frend, Charles R.” The dorse is endorsed “From the King, Oxford Ap. 29 1645, Cypher”.

The head of the letter: date, Duplicate, clear opening and the first cipher lines
BL Add MS 18983 f. 14: the clear opening and the first cipher lines. Image: British Library, Add MS 18983 f. 14, via DECODE R4921.

02 The key

The letter uses Lasry’s “TNA SP106-5” key, reconstructed in 2020 from Henrietta Maria’s circle’s letters of January 1646 (TNA SP 106/10 f. 247). Its alphabet is homophonic: E = 1–5, A = 14–17, T = 78–80, and so on. Its nomenclator groups include a1 = and, a4 = be, c5 = for, e5 = in, f2 = it, h1 = no, k1 = of, n1 = to, n3 = the, p6 = which. It was applied without change.

The key has no values for the groups 81–98. Most of them stand at the end of a phrase and act as nulls or stops. Two recur with a meaning fixed by context: 95 = my and 98 = artillery (“transport my artillery to you”, “bring my train of artillery”). Several letter+digit groups the key leaves blank are fixed by context: c2 = do, b2 = can, k4 = nor, and 412 in “412-ant” = warr(ant).

Before the key was found, two other ciphers were ruled out. The Duke of Richmond’s cipher, used in the sibling letter of 31 July 1645 (R4922), has letter values above 100. The Digby–Walsingham key (R8724) is a different system. A ciphertext-only homophonic solver on the numbers alone did not converge.

03 The decipherment

Modernised spelling; groups still open and values supplied from context are in square brackets.

Nephew, if you have received my two which were upon Friday and Sunday last, this will be the less necessary; howsoever it is fit to tell you that I very much like your opinion [61] for the present. Know [that] to [?thow] to follow it until I [211 186] enough to convoy, and draught [horses] enough to transport my artillery to you; to which [c1: end?] I have sent for Goring, who I hope (yet will not warrant) to be able to do both. But what [d4] can not [be done] if you do not [376] all our [148]s be in order: therefore I desire you to [327: march] speedily for my assistance, that in case I can not bring my train of artillery to you, you [may] come and fetch it; assuring you that no time shall be lost, nor pains spared for doing of this, if it be possible, upon the word of your loving uncle and most faithful friend, Charles R.

It agrees with Digby’s letter of 27 April, printed by Warburton (iii 77–78): “since your Highness says, you cannot relieve the place without the train, and that it is not possible for the King to bring the train to Prince Rupert…”. It also agrees with Digby’s of 30 April, which asks Rupert for one hundred draught horses.

04 What remains uncertain

Full texts

The transcription and the decryption of every document on this page, so that the reading can be used and checked. Short files are shown here; all are in the repository.

R4921, BL Add MS 18983 f. 14, Oxford, 29 April 1645

Charles I at Oxford, hemmed in by Cromwell's raids, to Prince Rupert: he cannot move his train of artillery without horses and a convoy, has sent for Goring, and asks Rupert to march speedily to fetch it. This agrees with Digby's letters of 27 and 30 April and with Rupert's march on Oxford in early May, which led to Naseby.

Transcription

transcription.txt

# BL Add MS 18983 f.14 (DECODE R4921), Charles I to Prince Rupert, Oxford 29 April 1645. "Duplicate".
# Transcribed from IMG_R4921_I28579_P1.jpg. Clear text in [brackets]; groups separated by spaces.
# ? = uncertain reading. One line per manuscript line.
# 30 Sept 2026: in the line "75 86 93 ..." the sign after 3 is the King's clear "&" (same form as in "friday & sonday"
# and "Oncle & most"), not the group e5 (in), which he writes small elsewhere; the line before ends "68 4" at the torn
# right edge, probably 45 with the 5 lost (68 45 75 = you).
[Nepueu, if you have receaved my two which were upon friday & sonday]
[last this will be the lesse necessarye howsoeuer it is fit to tell you that I very]
[much like your opinion] 61 c5 n3 35 65 2 60 4 50 79 81 41 50
47 54 85 n1 79 38 47 55 n1 8 45 27 29 44 56 84 f2 74
49 80 30 28 29 90 32 211 186 2 50 47 77 19 40 83 n1 11 46
49 75 44 67 85 a1 5 64 14 77 20 40 79 88 214 58 3 15 4
76 19 38 84 n1 78 64 14 49 59 36 45 66 80 81 95 98 n1 o1
44 77 86 n1 p6 c1 [I have] 57 4 49 78 87 c5 19 47 66 30
50 18 89 54 38 44 [I] 38 45 35 1 93 [(yett will] h1 80 412 16
49 79 85 n1 a4 15 22 27 3 n1 [)] c2 22 44 80 38 84 [but what]
d4 b2 h1 80 e4 67 47 76 c2 h1 80 376 16 27 29 45 76 66 148
58 03 a4 e5 32 59 [order,] 05 c5 3 30 6 4 58 32 64 4 90
68 47 77 n1 327 57 34 3 4 6 30 28 69 88 c5 95 14 57 59 32
58 80 17 50 12 2 84 n2 e5 12 16 58 4 83 30 b2 h1 80 21 66
32 49 18 81 95 78 66 16 31 50 4 89 k1 98 n1 67 45 76 84 68 4
75 86 93 11 44 26 3 [&] 8 4 80 12 40 83 f2 [assuringe you]
[that] h1 80 32 25 1 85 57 39 17 27 29 a4 27 47 57 79 87 k4
36 17 31 50 4 59 82 59 35 16 64 5 c5 c2 e5 19 k1 n4 46 80
40 2 64 54 32 58 1 90 e4 f2 a4 35 46 57 60 30 23 27 3
83 [upon the word of] [Your loving Oncle & most faithfull frend Charles R.]
Transcription

ciphertext.txt

61 c5 n3 35 65 2 60 4 50 79 81 41 50
47 54 85 n1 79 38 47 55 n1 8 45 27 29 44 56 84 f2 74
49 80 30 28 29 90 32 211 186 2 50 47 77 19 40 83 n1 11 46
49 75 44 67 85 a1 5 64 14 77 20 40 79 88 214 58 3 15 4
76 19 38 84 n1 78 64 14 49 59 36 45 66 80 81 95 98 n1 o1
44 77 86 n1 p6 c1 57 4 49 78 87 c5 19 47 66 30
50 18 89 54 38 44 38 45 35 1 93 h1 80 412 16
49 79 85 n1 a4 15 22 27 3 n1 c2 22 44 80 38 84
d4 b2 h1 80 e4 67 47 76 c2 h1 80 376 16 27 29 45 76 66 148
58 03 a4 e5 32 59 05 c5 3 30 6 4 58 32 64 4 90
68 47 77 n1 327 57 34 3 4 6 30 28 69 88 c5 95 14 57 59 32
58 80 17 50 12 2 84 n2 e5 12 16 58 4 83 30 b2 h1 80 21 66
32 49 18 81 95 78 66 16 31 50 4 89 k1 98 n1 67 45 76 84 68 4
75 86 93 11 44 26 3 8 4 80 12 40 83 f2
h1 80 32 25 1 85 57 39 17 27 29 a4 27 47 57 79 87 k4
36 17 31 50 4 59 82 59 35 16 64 5 c5 c2 e5 19 k1 n4 46 80
40 2 64 54 32 58 1 90 e4 f2 a4 35 46 57 60 30 23 27 3
83
Decryption

reading.md

## Reading (`reading.md`)

Groups 81–98 are not in the key. Most sit at phrase ends (nulls or stops). Two recur with meaning read from context:
95 = my, 98 = artillery. Letter+digit groups the key leaves open are read from context and marked [conj.].

> I very much like your opinion [61] for the present. Know [that] to [?]thow to follow it until I [211 186] enough to
> convoy, and draught [horses, 214] enough to transport my artillery to you; to which [end, c1] I have sent for
> Goring, who I hope (yet will not warrant) to be able to do both. But what [d4] can not [be done] if you do not
> [376] all our [148]s be in order: therefore I desire you to [march, 327] speedily for my assistance, that in case I
> can not bring my train of artillery to you, you [may] come and fetch it; assuring you that no time shall be lost,
> nor pains spared for doing of this, if it be possible, upon the word of your loving uncle.

"You [may] come and fetch it" (corrected 30 Sept 2026; it read "you may come and fetch it"):
- "you" is 68 4 | 75, y-e-u as it stands. The 4 is at the torn right edge of the line and is probably 45 (o), the 5 lost.
- 86 and 93 follow. They are outside the key and stand at phrase ends elsewhere (after "to you", after "I hope"). So
  "may" has no group of its own and is supplied from the sense; the key's "may" is g3.
- "and" is not a cipher group. The King wrote a clear "&" there, the same sign as in "friday & sonday" and
  "Oncle & most". It was first transcribed as e5, which is "in" on the key.

Sense: the King, at Oxford and hemmed in by Cromwell's raids, cannot move his train (artillery) to Rupert without
horses and a convoy. He has sent for Goring and asks Rupert to march quickly to fetch it. This agrees with Digby's
letters of 27 and 30 April (Warburton iii 77–81) and with Rupert's march on Oxford in early May, which led to Naseby.

## Open

Key: key.md

05 Sources

Notes, transcription, decipherment and profile: targets/rupert1645/ in the repository.