25 85 0 20 25 15 86 55 10 95 70 70 20 90 96 55 45
25 95 0 70 20 75 15 80 65 51 0 45 70 …
hellip;
two-digit figures, most ending in 5 or 0, set inside clear Italian

Eger → Cardinal Ippolito d’Este · two-digit numerical cipher · 25 July 1520

Alfonso Cistarelli, Eger, 25 July 1520

Ippolito I d'Este
toIppolito I d'Este

A page of two-digit figures from the Cardinal’s agent at Eger: a ciphertext-only search finds language in it but only fragments, and the photograph does not settle the digits.

Daniel Bourdeau · posted · updated

Method: not solved · Extent: text not obtained

Credits · Brice Dudout (new cipher)

At a glanceNot solved · text not obtained

The letter
Alfonso Cistarelli, Cardinal Ippolito I d’Este’s agent at Eger, to the Cardinal, 25 July 1520: four pages, the cipher on the second, clear text before and after it.
Where
Archivio di Stato di Modena, Ambasciatori, Ungheria b. 4, Cistarelli no. 3 (b. 4/26); DECODE R1137 (catalogue item 158), Vestigia 1904.
The cipher
Two-digit figures written without spaces, most ending in 5 or 0, with a few letter signs (f, k, u, y): 584 figure groups and 83 other signs, set inside clear Italian. Homophonic on the evidence of the search.
How it was tried
A ciphertext-only solver (simulated annealing on a sixteenth-century Italian model), checked against the same figures shuffled; cribs from Caprile’s letters of the same months, checked against control words.
Why it resists
The solver finds more language than in the shuffled control, but only phrases. Two readings of the same lines disagree on one group in seven, and no key or decipherment exists in the file, on DECODE or in print.
The October letter
Cistarelli no. 7 (Kraków, 14 Oct 1520, to Duke Alfonso I; Vestigia 1908), in the same figures. Only one line of its cipher is legible in the surviving photocopy, and it does not decode.
What would finish it
A better photograph from the archive, to settle the digits, then the search again.
Other ciphers
Giuliano Caprile’s letters in the same box are in other ciphers, each with its own page: his 1520–21 sign cipher and his 1519 two-tier cipher.
Lines of run-together two-digit figures with a few words of clear Italian
R1137, the second page: the clear opening line, then the figures run together without spaces, with clear words between some of the groups. Image: Archivio di Stato di Modena, Ambasciatori, Ungheria b. 4, Cistarelli no. 3, p. 2, via Vestigia 1904.

01 The letter

Cistarelli was the Cardinal’s agent at Eger, the Hungarian see Ippolito d’Este held; Vestigia has twenty of his records. Only no. 3, of 25 July 1520, carries cipher, and none has a decipherment, a clear copy or a gloss. Pages 1 and 3 are clear text and page 4 the address; the cipher is on page 2. DECODE’s “partially decrypted” reflects the clear passages.

02 The October letter

Brice Dudout pointed out a second letter in the same figures (28 October 2026): Cistarelli no. 7, 14 October 1520, Vestigia 1908, not on DECODE. Vestigia names Duke Alfonso I as the addressee and Kraków as the place, and the clear text agrees. It answers the Duke’s letter about “la grave infirmità e disperata salute” of the writer’s lord and reports his death: Cardinal Ippolito died on 3 September 1520. It goes on about the Queen, the King of Hungary, and the bishopric and castle of Eger. The groups are the same as in July: two digits ending in 0 or 5, mixed with the letter signs f, k, u, y, x, h, g and m.

A line of run-together two-digit figures between lines of clear Italian
The October letter, line 7: after “dala S.ma Regina”, 34 figure groups and letter signs, then the clear “e sino questo”. Image: Archivio di Stato di Modena, Ambasciatori, Ungheria b. 4, Alfonso Cistarelli no. 7, via Vestigia 1908 (photograph of a photocopy).

Line 7 can be transcribed (34 tokens), and so can seven groups at the end of line 27. The roughly six lines of cipher below them are mostly lost in the dark bands of the old photocopy that the online image shows. With the July letter’s search key, line 7 decodes as “adlmodegmo?racentogseti?tipodtare”. A new search over both letters gives “…framento…portare”. These are fragments, not a reading. Brice Dudout has asked the archive for the original.

03 What was tried

04 What would finish it

Better photographs of Cistarelli no. 3, and of the original of no. 7 rather than a photocopy, from the Archivio di Stato di Modena, then a fresh transcription and the search again. Whether noise is really what stops the solve is a judgement, not a proof. Attempted, not solved.

05 Sources

Transcription, solver runs and notes: targets/cistarelli1520/ in the repository. This entry was split on 14 October 2026 from the old Caprile and Cistarelli page (one key per entry).